🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain figures to follow this lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Outside of the West, other nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies take a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

Even as this international discussion continues, the actions of Australia and others indicate that states globally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.